CSLB discipline
A suspension or revocation is not a single event affecting a single license. Under the Contractors State License Law, discipline against one license can reach other licenses connected to the same licensee without any further notice, continuing to work during a suspension is separately a misdemeanor, and revocation triggers a statutory waiting period that follows named personnel to any new application. This guide, reviewed by Jayson R. Elliott, sets out the consequences that follow from each and what Business and Professions Code section 7102 requires before a license comes back.
It is tempting to read suspension as a short revocation and revocation as a long suspension. The statute does not treat them that way. Section 7102 gives the registrar discretion to reinstate a suspended license on proof of compliance, and imposes on a revoked license a fixed statutory waiting period, an affirmative showing of satisfied losses, and a reach into the personnel of the revoked licensee. The difference is structural.
This is the consequence contractors most often do not see coming, and it is worth stating carefully.
Under section 7097, when a license has been suspended by a decision of the registrar pursuant to an accusation or pursuant to certain other specified provisions, any additional license issued under the chapter in the name of the licensee — or for which the licensee furnished qualifying experience and appearance under section 7068 — may be suspended by the registrar without further notice. Section 7098 applies the same rule to revocation: when a license has been revoked, additional licenses in the licensee’s name may be revoked by the registrar without further notice.
Two features of that pair matter operationally. First, “without further notice” means the cascade does not require its own proceeding. Second, the reach extends beyond licenses held in the same name, to licenses for which the licensee furnished the qualifying experience and appearance under section 7068. A qualifying individual who lent their qualifications to more than one entity is exposed across all of them, not only the one that was disciplined.
Continuing to perform covered work while a license sits suspended produces two distinct problems that operate independently.
The first is criminal. As covered on the licensing hub, section 7028(a)(2) makes it a misdemeanor to perform acts covered by the chapter under a license that is under suspension for failure to pay a civil penalty, to comply with an order of correction under section 7090.1, or to resolve outstanding final liabilities under section 7145.5.
The second is financial. Section 7031 bars an action to recover compensation for work requiring a license where the person performing it was not properly licensed. Work performed during a suspension therefore raises a payment question independent of any disciplinary or criminal exposure — and unlike a fine, that consequence attaches to the money for the job itself.
Not every revocation arrives through a contested proceeding. Section 7090.1 addresses revocation for failure to comply with the final order of a citation, and it contains a provision worth knowing before the date passes rather than after.
The registrar may delay that revocation for good cause, and the delay may not exceed one year. To seek it, the licensee must apply to the registrar in writing before the date the license would be revoked by operation of law, stating the reasons that establish good cause. The registrar’s power to grant the delay expires on the effective date of the revocation by operation of law — so this is a deadline that closes rather than a remedy that remains available afterward.
Section 7090.1 also provides that a cited licensee is automatically prohibited from serving as an officer, director, associate, partner, manager, or qualifying individual of another licensee for the period the registrar determines. That prohibition is a second route by which discipline against one entity reaches a contractor’s role in others.
Section 7102 provides that after suspension on any of the grounds in the chapter, the registrar may reinstate the license on proof of compliance by the contractor with all provisions of the decision as to reinstatement — or, where the decision contains no reinstatement provisions, in the sound discretion of the registrar. The operative posture is compliance and discretion, not a waiting period.
Revocation is governed by a much harder rule. Under section 7102, after revocation the license shall not be reinstated or reissued — and a license shall not be issued to any member of the personnel of the revoked licensee found to have had knowledge of or participated in the acts or omissions constituting grounds for revocation — within a minimum period of one year and a maximum period of five years after the final decision of revocation. Reinstatement or reissuance then requires a proper showing on two points: that all loss caused by the act or omission for which the license was revoked has been fully satisfied, and that all conditions imposed by the decision of revocation have been complied with.
Read that carefully in two places. The bar runs from the final decision of revocation, not from the conduct. And it reaches personnel individually where they had knowledge of or participated in the underlying acts — meaning a revocation against an entity can follow specific people into a later application under a different entity.
Section 7102 addresses one situation expressly. Where a loss has been reduced to a monetary obligation or debt, satisfaction of that obligation as a prerequisite to issuance, reissuance, or reinstatement is not required to the extent the obligation was discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding. Any nonmonetary condition not discharged in bankruptcy still has to be complied with before the license issues.
Section 7124.6 governs disclosure on the Board’s public license record. Revocations that are not stayed are disclosed indefinitely from the effective date of the revocation.
For a contractor weighing how hard to contest a matter, that is a material fact. A stayed revocation and an unstayed one are not equivalent outcomes on the public record, and the record is what owners, general contractors, and prequalification processes look at.
Suspension
Revocation
Additional licenses
May be suspended without further notice (§7097)
May be revoked without further notice (§7098)
Reach beyond same name
Licenses qualified via §7068 appearance
Licenses qualified via §7068 appearance
Working anyway
§7028(a)(2) misdemeanor; §7031 payment bar
Not licensed — same exposures
Path back
Registrar may reinstate on compliance, or in sound discretion (§7102)
Minimum 1 year, maximum 5 years after the final decision (§7102)
Additional showing required
Compliance with the decision’s reinstatement provisions
All loss fully satisfied + all conditions complied with
Reaches individuals
Via §7090.1 prohibition on serving in named roles
Personnel with knowledge or participation barred from issuance (§7102)
Public record
Per §7124.6 disclosure rules
Unstayed revocations disclosed indefinitely (§7124.6)
This table maps statutory consequences. What a particular decision imposes is set by that decision, and decisions vary.
Before you ask
Business and Professions Code section 7102 sets a minimum period of one year and a maximum period of five years after the final decision of revocation before a license may be reinstated or reissued. Reissuance also requires a proper showing that all loss caused by the act or omission has been fully satisfied and that all conditions imposed by the decision of revocation have been complied with.
Yes. Business and Professions Code section 7097 provides that when a license is suspended by a decision of the registrar pursuant to an accusation or certain other specified provisions, any additional license issued in the name of the licensee — or for which the licensee furnished qualifying experience and appearance under section 7068 — may be suspended by the registrar without further notice. Section 7098 applies the same rule to revocation.
No, and there are two separate consequences. Business and Professions Code section 7028(a)(2) makes it a misdemeanor to perform covered work under a license suspended for failure to pay a civil penalty, comply with an order of correction under section 7090.1, or resolve outstanding final liabilities under section 7145.5. Separately, section 7031 bars recovery of compensation for work requiring a license performed while not properly licensed.
It can. Business and Professions Code section 7102 bars issuance of a license to any member of the personnel of the revoked licensee found to have had knowledge of or participated in the acts or omissions constituting grounds for revocation, for the same one-to-five-year period. Section 7090.1 separately prohibits a cited licensee from serving as an officer, director, associate, partner, manager, or qualifying individual of another licensee for the period the registrar determines.
Business and Professions Code section 7090.1 permits the registrar to delay that revocation for good cause, for no more than one year. The licensee must apply to the registrar in writing before the date of revocation by operation of law and state the reasons establishing good cause — the registrar’s power to grant the delay expires on the effective date of the revocation.
Business and Professions Code section 7124.6 provides that revocations that are not stayed are disclosed indefinitely from the effective date of the revocation. Whether a revocation is stayed therefore affects not only the immediate ability to operate but what appears on the public record that owners and general contractors review.
Keep reading
Breadcrumb + parent reference
Sibling — what precedes an outcome
Breadcrumb + “as covered on the licensing hub” (§7028)
§7031 payment consequence section
Cross-pillar — payment consequences of unlicensed status
Inline first mention: qualifying individual, RMO, registrar, stayed revocation, reinstatement
Attorneys section — end of article
Assigned attorney profile (NOT YET BUILT)
If this describes your situation, an attorney affiliated with Bay Legal PC, CA Bar No. 332479, can review it with you.