Defect liability

The Prelitigation Notice and Repair Timeline, Step by Step

The Right to Repair Act runs on short deadlines, and several of them are shorter than a builder’s ordinary correspondence cycle. Fourteen days to acknowledge. Fourteen more to inspect. Three days to decide a second inspection is needed. This page sets the sequence out with the statutory source for each step and the consequence attached to it. Reviewed by Jayson R. Elliott. If a claim notice has arrived, the first deadline is already running.

The timeline at a glance

Step

Deadline

Source

If missed

Claim notice served

Starts the clock

§910

Builder acknowledges in writing

14 days from receipt

§913

Claimant released (§915)

Initial inspection and testing

14 days from acknowledgment

§916

Claimant released (§916(d))

Request second inspection

3 days from initial inspection

§916(c)

Second inspection unavailable

Second inspection complete

40 days from first inspection

§916(c)

Claimant released (§916(d))

Written offer to repair

30 days from initial or second inspection

§917

Claimant released (§920)

Homeowner authorises or requests alternative

30 days from offer

§918

Mediation, if requested

15 days from request

§919

Repairs commence

14 days from acceptance

§921

Claimant released (§925)

Repairs complete

Every effort within 120 days

§921

Claimant released (§925)

Step 1: the claim notice (§910)

The claimant serves written notice describing the claim in reasonable detail sufficient to determine the nature and location, to the extent known, of the claimed violation. Receipt is the reference point for everything that follows, which makes date-stamping incoming claim notices a practical necessity rather than a formality.

Step 2: acknowledge within 14 days (§913)

The builder or the builder’s representative must acknowledge receipt of the notice, in writing, within 14 days after receipt. Section 915 releases the claimant from the prelitigation requirements if this is missed.

If the notice came from the claimant’s legal representative, or a written representation letter arrives from a homeowner’s attorney, section 913 requires the builder to include that attorney in all subsequent substantive communications.

Step 3: inspect within 14 days of acknowledgment (§916)

Where the builder elects to inspect, the initial inspection and testing must be completed within 14 days after the acknowledgment of receipt, at a mutually convenient date and time. Section 916(d) releases the claimant if the builder fails to inspect within the time limits.

Section 916(e) is the step to plan around rather than merely comply with: the builder gives notice to subcontractors, design professionals, suppliers, and insurers, and notifies the claimant of those invitees. Deciding who to bring belongs before the inspection is scheduled, not after.

The 3-day second-inspection window

This is the tightest deadline in the chapter and the easiest to lose. Under section 916(c), the builder may request an additional inspection within 3 days of the initial inspection, specifying the reasons. The second inspection must then be completed within 40 days of the first.

Three days means the decision has to be made effectively at the inspection itself. A builder who sends someone to take a first look and then convenes internally to decide whether expert testing is needed has usually already missed it.

Step 4: offer to repair within 30 days (§§917, 919, 924)

Within 30 days of the initial inspection — or of the second inspection if one was requested — the builder may offer in writing to repair the violation. The offer must compensate the homeowner for all applicable damages recoverable under the Act within the repair timeframe. Section 920 releases the claimant if no offer is made or the builder otherwise fails to strictly comply.

Two provisions attach to the offer itself. Under section 919, the offer to repair is accompanied by an offer to mediate the dispute at the homeowner’s election. And under section 924, if the builder elects to repair some but not all of the claimed unmet standards, the builder must — at the same time it makes the offer — set forth with particularity in writing the reasons, and the support for those reasons, for not repairing all of them.

Section 924 rewards specificity. A partial offer that does not explain itself with particularity is a partial offer with a compliance problem attached.

Step 5: the homeowner responds within 30 days (§918)

Upon receipt of the offer to repair, the homeowner has 30 days to authorise the builder to proceed with the repair, or to request that the repair be performed by a different contractor.

Step 6: mediation, if requested (§919)

Where mediation is elected, it occurs within 15 days after the request to mediate is received, at a mutually convenient location within the county where the action is pending. It is limited to four hours except as otherwise mutually agreed, before a nonaffiliated mediator selected and paid for by the builder.

Where a builder has made an offer to repair and mediation has failed to resolve the dispute, the homeowner is to allow the repair to be performed — by the builder, its contractor, or the selected contractor.

Step 7: perform the repair (§921)

Repairs are to be commenced within 14 days of acceptance, performed with the utmost diligence, and completed as soon as reasonably possible, with every effort made to complete them within 120 days.

Completion is enforced. Section 925 provides that if the builder fails to complete the repair within the time specified in the repair plan, the claimant is released from the requirements of the chapter and may proceed with filing an action — and where that happens, the Act’s standards continue to apply to the resulting action.

Protections that run alongside the process (§§922, 923)

Two provisions are worth knowing because they cut in different directions.

Section 922 provides that nothing occurring during the repair process may be used or introduced as evidence to support a spoliation defense by any potential party in subsequent litigation. Performing the repair does not create a spoliation exposure for having altered the condition.

Section 923 runs the other way: the builder must provide the homeowner or the homeowner’s legal representative, upon request, with copies of all correspondence, photographs, and other materials pertaining or relating in any manner to the repairs. Documentation generated during the repair is discoverable on request as a matter of statute.

The cash offer alternative (§929)

Section 929 provides that nothing in the chapter prohibits the builder from making only a cash offer and no repair. That is a genuine strategic option where the repair scope is uncertain or where the relationship has deteriorated to the point that returning to the property is unattractive. The homeowner remains free to accept or reject it.

What tolling and the motion to stay do (§§927, 930)

Where mediation is used, applicable statutes of limitations are tolled from the date of the request to mediate until the next court day after the mediation is completed, or the 100-day period, whichever is later. Section 927 addresses the extension of limitations periods in connection with the process more generally.

Section 930 addresses the other side of compliance. Where the claimant does not conform with the chapter’s requirements, the builder may bring a motion to stay a subsequent court action until those requirements have been satisfied, and the court in its discretion may award the prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs in bringing or opposing the motion. The claimant bears the burden on such a motion of proving compliance.

Where sources disagree

Two points are worth stating openly rather than presenting with false confidence.

On the repair completion target under section 921, most sources state that every effort must be made to complete the work within 120 days. One published summary states 20 days. The 120-day figure is adopted here — it appears in more sources, and 20 days is implausibly short for construction repair work — but a builder relying on the completion window should confirm it directly.

On the extension of limitations periods under section 927, sources describe a 100-day period following completion of repair and a separate period following expiry of the response time, with less consistency than elsewhere in the chapter. This page states the tolling rule tied to mediation, which is well supported, and does not attempt precise figures for section 927 generally.

Before you ask

Questions contractors ask first.

What are the SB 800 deadlines for a builder?

Civil Code section 913 requires written acknowledgment within 14 days of receiving the claim notice; section 916 requires the initial inspection within 14 days of that acknowledgment, with a second inspection requested within 3 days of the first and completed within 40 days of it; and section 917 allows a written offer to repair within 30 days of the initial or second inspection. Missing these releases the claimant under sections 915, 916(d), and 920.

How long does a builder have to complete SB 800 repairs?

Civil Code section 921 requires repairs to be commenced within 14 days of acceptance, performed with the utmost diligence, and completed as soon as reasonably possible, with every effort made to complete them within 120 days. Section 925 releases the claimant to file an action if the builder fails to complete the repair within the time specified in the repair plan.

Can a builder offer money instead of repairing?

Yes. Civil Code section 929 provides that nothing in the chapter prohibits the builder from making only a cash offer and no repair. The homeowner remains free to accept or reject it, so a cash offer is a strategic option rather than a way to end the matter unilaterally.

What if a builder only wants to repair some of the claimed defects?

Civil Code section 924 permits a partial repair but attaches a condition: if the builder elects to repair some but not all of the claimed unmet standards, it must, at the same time it makes its offer, set forth with particularity in writing the reasons and the support for those reasons for not repairing all of them.

Does doing the repair create a spoliation problem for the builder?

No. Civil Code section 922 provides that nothing occurring during the repair process may be used or introduced as evidence to support a spoliation defense by any potential party in subsequent litigation. Note that section 923 separately requires the builder to provide, on request, copies of all correspondence, photographs, and other materials relating to the repairs.

What happens if the homeowner skips the prelitigation process?

Civil Code section 930 allows the builder to bring a motion to stay a subsequent court action until the chapter’s requirements have been satisfied, and the court in its discretion may award the prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs on the motion. The claimant bears the burden of proving compliance.

Talk to an Attorney Today

If this describes your situation, an attorney affiliated with Bay Legal PC, CA Bar No. 332479, can review it with you.